Legal Opinion

Grinde v. Dakota Trust & Savings Bank

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1929No. File No. 6244PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

In substance, the complaint alleges that defendant in May, 1921, was owner of 121 shares of the capital stock of the 'Farmers’ State Bank of DeSmet -and that defendant’s cashier, V. H. Masters, was the owner of xo shares of stock in said Farmers’ State Bank, by reason whereof defendant bank and Masters were in -control of the Farmers’ State Bank; that defendant bank, desiring to have *176plaintiff take charge of and operate the DeSrnet bank,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Fechheimer Fisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Porter v. Plymouth Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McIntyre v. E. Bement's SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hoover Steel Ball Co. v. Schaefer Ball Bearings Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davies v. Montana Auto Finance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API