Legal Opinion

Crain v. Sumida

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1922No. Civ. No. 3680PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This action was brought against H. Sumida and K. Sumida to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff in a collision between his automobile and an auto delivery truck the driver of which was alleged by plaintiff to be an employee of both defendants. Plaintiff recovered a verdict against the defendant H. Sumida for the sum of $1,450. From a judgment entered on that verdict H. Sumida has taken this appeal.

It developed at the trial that the delivery truck, instead of being the property of both defendants, was the property of H. Sumida only, by whom it was used in a general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. McWhirter v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kohl v. ArpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Bushnell v. Yoshika TashiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Irelan-Yuba Gold Quartz Mining Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API