Legal Opinion

ISK Biotech Corp. v. Lindsay

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 16, 1996No. 01-95-01205-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDELL, Justice.

The underlying litigation is an action 1 by relator ISK Biotech Corp. (ISK) against real party in interest John Brown E & C (Brown-co) for breach of contract and fraud, arising out of the undertaking known between them as the “Bravo 825 project,” which called for Brownco to construct a “spray dryer” facility at ISK’s existing chemical plant. ISK complains of Judge Lindsay’s orders granting a protective order in favor of real party in interest John Brown E & C (Brownco) and refusing to compel it to produce specified documents. We agree that Judge Lindsay’s ruling…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Able Supply Co. v. MoyeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Granada Corp. v. Honorable First Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. American Book Company v. MarrsTexas Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Energas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
  2. In Re WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  3. Hernandez v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels & FriendCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. in Re State Farm LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. in Re Kubosh Bail Bonding, Kubosh Law Office, Paul Kubosh and Felix Michael KuboshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API