Meditech International Co. v. Minigrip, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Meditech International Company (“Meditech”) has sued Minigrip, Inc. (“Minigrip”), alleging violations of Sherman Act §§ 1 and 2, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, and part of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization's Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a). 1 Minigrip has now moved for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12(b)(1) (lack of subject matter jurisdiction) and Rule 12(b)(6) (failure to state a claim). For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order:
1. Minigrip’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion is denied for the present.
2. Ruling on its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Marie Ellsworth & Paul Ellsworth v. City of Racine, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bruce Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Alberta Gas Chemicals, Ltd. v. Celanese Corporation and Celanese Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Shaw v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991