Valerio v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for possession of heroin. Punishment was assessed by the jury at 40 years.
Appellant’s first three contentions are directed to the admission of appellant’s oral confession which led to the discovery of the contraband.
Appellant urges that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the arresting officers complied with the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. 1 He argues that the court erred in basing a determination of the admissibility of the oral confession upon the hearsay…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Cisneros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Farr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Lackey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.