Farr v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for felony theft; punishment was assessed by the jury at imprisonment for five (5) years.
It is appellant’s contention that the confession introduced at trial was the result of coercion, threats, and fear and, consequently, is invalid and inadmissible. Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227, 60 S.Ct. 472, 84 L.Ed. 716 (1940). Because of our disposi tion of this ground of error, it is not necessary to make an expatiated statement of facts except as pertains to the circumstances surrounding the confession and the Jackson v. Denno hearing. 1
From…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.