Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Worman
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 18, 1941No. 250JPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, an employee in the bakery business hereinafter mentioned, sues to recover wages alleged to be due him under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The suit is brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A.§ 216(b).
The defendant Samuel Worman conducts a small bakery and delicatessen business at 204 Broad Street, Jacksonville, Florida. The bakery business is about 25 per cent, wholesale and 75 per cent, retail. During the period in question, the average wholesale sales per week were $120 and the average weekly retail sales were $468.
Except as hereinafter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gulf Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fleming v. Arsenal Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Muldowney v. Seaberg Elevator Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Collins v. KiddDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1941
- Rauhoff v. Henry Gramling & Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1941
- Hill v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.