Legal Opinion

The Bank of San Luis Obispo v. Wickersham

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1893No. 19181PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

The plaintiff is a banking corporation, and in its complaint alleges that on September 10, 187.6, it was financially embarrassed and unable to meet its liabilities without borrowing large sums of money, and that the defendant Wickersham was then the owner of four hundred shares of its stock, each share being of the par value of one hundred dollars, but the actual value of which did not exceed seventy-five dollars per share, and that the plaintiff was then offering the unsold shares of its capital stock for eighty dollars per share, but was unable to find subscribers therefor. It is further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Page v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  2. American Railway-Frog Co. v. HavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Brennan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Bellona Company's CaseHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1831

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Maryland Trust Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. King v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API