Legal Opinion
Dombrovskis v. Murff
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 2, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, deportable alien seamen, move for leave to file an amended complaint under Rule 15(a) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A.
In November 1958, plaintiffs filed their original complaint alleging inter alia that they were illegally deprived of their right to be issued special non-quota visas pursuant to section 15 of the Act of September 11, 1957 (Public Law 85-316, 71 Stat. 639), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1971a note. They claimed that the Departments of State and Justice had illegally agreed not to issue these special non-quota visas to persons who entered the United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heay v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Fli-Fab, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1954
- Russo v. Sofia Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Szalkiewicz v. Farrell Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Public Administrator of New York County v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Slotkin v. Brookdale Hospital CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Cunningham v. JaffeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
- Aalco Construction Company, a Corporation, and Robert W. Sewell v. F. H. Linneman Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Glazer Steel Corp. v. Yawata Iron & Steel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.