Legal Opinion

People v. Meseros

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1910No. Crim. No. 318PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. Wm. S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement and moved for a new trial, which being denied and judgment rendered, he took an appeal to this court from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is charged in the information that defendant, as the servant and agent of Michael Eftimakis, at the county of Alameda, on the seventh day of July, 1910, came into the possession of ,$88.60 in lawful money of the United States of the personal property of said Eftimakis, and then and there at said county of Alameda did fraudulently embezzle and appropriate the same to his own…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Goodhue v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. MispagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. People v. LeavensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. State v. ChapinOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. SeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. BorchersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API