Legal Opinion

People v. Borchers

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1926No. Docket No. Crim. 2865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

The defendant, William C. Borchers, was indicted by the grand jury of the county of Los Angeles in ten counts—five for the crimes of larceny and five for embezzlement. As to the five larceny counts and one of the counts of embezzlement the prosecution was abandoned, but defendant was found guilty of embezzlement on each of the four remaining counts—numbered one, three, five, and nine. A motion for a new trial was interposed and denied, whereupon judgment of conviction was pronounced on each of the said four counts. The district court of appeal reversed the judgment and order so far as they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RiccardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. State v. MispagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. People v. GavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. People v. MeserosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. State v. MilliganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. ApplegateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API