Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Burr Printing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 14, 1928No. 256PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
We cannot agree with the learned judge in. substituting for the judgment of the defendant his own estimate of the value of the plan. Assuming that Chamberlin and Linton, the defendant’s representatives, had opportunity to examine it to their satisfaction on October 4, 1920, and that Taylor did not misstate its contents, their acceptance was final, and forbids a court to appraise its value by any standards of its own. These men were not children, but seasoned in their business, and, if they chose to enter into an improvident contract,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Turner v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- In re American Knit Goods Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Marvin Stern, and Cross-Appellant v. Satra Corporation and Satra Consultant Corporation, and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Blakeslee v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- McNabb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Dellefield v. Blockdel Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.