Graham v. Tuchtenhagen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover compensation for procuring a purchaser for the defendant’s farm. There was a verdict for the plaintiff.' The defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
On May 1, 1920, the plaintiff and defendant entered- into a contract whereby the plaintiff acquired the exclusive right to sell *423defendant’s quarter-section farm in Wright county for $33,000 net, he to have all above that sum as compensation. The provision as to price and terms was as follows:
“The price at which the said parties of the second part are hereby authorized to sell said premises is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Huntley v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Flower v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Van Norman v. FitchetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Goodwin v. SiemenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Appleby v. DysingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hare v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947