Legal Opinion

Stone's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The sole question argued and now presented for decision is whether an employee of the Commonwealth “doing regular farm work” on a farm “connected with” the Worcester State Hospital is entitled to compensation under those sections of the workmen’s compensation law applicable to public employees. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, §§ 69-75. We assume without deciding that the claimant was a “farm laborer” as those words are used in G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, § 67.

The contention of the Commonwealth is that the workmen’s compensation act as it was originally passed (St. 1911, c. 751) contained provisions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Devney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Keaney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Saxe's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Pettiti v. Edward J. McHugh & Son, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Coppola v. City of BeverlyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Moschella v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Narreau v. CorriveauMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API