Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Moschella v. City of Quincy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1964Published

1ConcurrenceKirk, J.

(concurring) Mr. Justice Spiegel and I agree that the plaintiff should recover. It is our view, however, that the decision should rest on different grounds. The *85fact that the Legislature has placed the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions, of which the defendant city is one, in a separate and distinct category under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (C. L. c. 152, §§ 69-75) should be the main premise upon which the opinion should be based. We think it is important that this approach should be used because, in our judgment, Pettiti v. Edward J. McHugh & Son, Inc. 341 Mass. 566, departs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Clark v. M. W. Leahy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Bresnahan v. BarreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Carlson v. DowgielewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Baumgardner v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API