Legal Opinion
Farmer v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1990No. S-2890, S-3072PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
Arthur Farmer brought suit against the State of Alaska and two State Troopers, Bill Weith and Mike Metrokin, claiming the troopers violated his state and federal constitutional right to be free from unreasonable government seizures, his right not to be deprived of property without due process of law, and his right to enjoy the rewards of his own industry. The trial court granted Metrokin’s motion for summary judgment, ruling the claim against Metrokin time-barred. The trial court additionally ruled that Farmer’s failure to join a third party defendant merited dismissal…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richard Berndt v. State of Tennessee and Lakeshore Mental Health InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Martech Construction Co. v. Ogden Environmental Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Mathis v. SauserAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Mount Juneau Enterprises, Inc. v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Geolar, Inc. v. Gilbert/Commonwealth Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.