Legal Opinion
Gage & Tucker v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 18, 1989No. Nos. 70556—70564 (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Judge.
Appellants, Gage & Tucker; Thompson & Mitchell; Lewis & Rice; Armstrong, Teasdale, Kramer & Vaughan; Husch, Ep-penberger, Donohue, Elson & Comfeld; Shook, Hardy & Bacon; Stinson, Mag & Fizzell; Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy P.C.; and Greensfelder, Hemker, Wiese, Gale & Chappelow P.C. are law firms with their principal offices in Missouri. They paid under protest a surplus line tax assessed on premiums paid to Attorneys Liability Assurance Society, Ltd. (ALAS) to indemnify them for potential losses as a result of legal malpractice. Their subsequent claims for refund were denied by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Missouri Bluffs Golf Joint VentureMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Quick v. WilhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995