Legal Opinion

Pendergrass v. Fagan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 19, 2008No. CE06176; A132050PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

At issue in this action for forcible entry and detainer (FED) is whether Oregon law recognizes a claim for “retaliatory eviction” when a landlord simply declines to renew a lease that has expired by its own terms. The trial court concluded that no such claim exists and granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiffs, the landlords. Defendant, the former tenant, contends that the trial court erred because she had alleged that the real reason for plaintiffs’ failure to renew her lease was that she had previously filed a complaint related to her previous tenancy and that, she argues, is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Beason v. HarcleroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. WerdellOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Withers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Edwards v. FennOregon Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rowlett v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Greene v. HRENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Lehman v. BielenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Schultz v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API