Legal Opinion

State v. Werdell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2006No. CC 01CR0750; CA A119326; SC S52980PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is a criminal case in which defendant, a practicing lawyer, was convicted after a jury trial in Curry County of one count of hindering prosecution, ORS 162.325. He appealed to the Court of Appeals, arguing (1) that venue for the charge did not lie in Curry County and (2) that in any event the facts did not constitute the offense. The Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Werdell, 202 Or App 413, 122 P3d 86 (2005). We allowed defendant’s petition for review and now, for the reasons that follow, reverse his conviction.

We state the relevant facts in the light most favorable to the state.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Dearborn v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. WerdellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pendergrass v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Collier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. State v. McCathernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API