Legal Opinion
Waskiewicz v. Egan, Administrator
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 7, 1947No. File 79853PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
Subsection (a) of section 1339e of the 1939 Cumulative Supplement to the General Statutes, as amended, provides that “An unemployed individual shall be eligible to receive benefits with respect to any week only if it shall be found that” he has mot certain conditions set forth in subdivision (1) of subsection (a), aforesaid. The wording clearly shows that these conditions (termed “Qualifications'”) are conditions precedent to eligibility to receive benefits. As such, the burden of proving facts showing that the claimant has satisfied these conditions precedent is on him. Stella v. Downyflake…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Herbst v. Hat Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Wyka v. Colt's Patent Fire Arms Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Civitello v. Connecticut Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mancini v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
- Brechu v. Rapid Transit Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1957
- Blakeslee v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1964
- Beckert v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.