Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Meifert

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1932No. 5849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Meifert -vras adjudicated a bankrupt upon bis voluntary petition. This ease involves his exemption rights. He claimed that he was not the owner of a homestead and that he was therefore entitled to certain personal property selected by him of the value of $500 as exempt under section 11738 of the General Code of Ohio. The trustee denied the claim. The bankrupt excepted. The referee overruled the exceptions and the bankrupt filed his petition for review. Thereupon the referee certified this question to the judge: “Was bankrupt entitled to have set off to him the exemptions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiller v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  2. In re StittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drybrough v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. Beeler v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  3. Detroit Trust Co. v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  4. David L. Skinner & Co. v. Nantasket Beach Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  5. Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API