Legal Opinion

Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1937No. 7579Published

1Per curiam

It appearing that the record presents no reviewable question because (1) it contains no finding of fact, and (2) it does not appear that the facts stated in the certificate of the referee were accepted by the District Judge, rule 34, clause 2 (b) of this court; Hiller v. Olmstead, 54 F.(2d) 5, 7 (C.C.A.6) ; In re Meifert, 57 F.(2d) 861 (C.C.A.6), it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, dismissed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiller v. OlmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  2. Hyman v. MeifertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932