Legal Opinion

Hiller v. Olmstead

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1931No. 5740PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The bankrupt, Burt Hiller, conducted a retail store under his own name in the city of Ludington, Mich. When the business was first started in September, 1921, Minnie Hiller, his wife, advanced $1,200 of her own funds, and from time to time-thereafter contributed further and smaller amounts to the venture. The building occupied by the store was held under a contract of purchase made in the names of both the husband and wife. The bank accounts were also carried in the names of both. Both contributed their services. A financial statement rendered to a creditor in 1926…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Artman v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Speier v. OpferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Thomas v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In Re WeissmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. T.F. James Company v. VakochNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Credit Collection Services, Inc. v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Jahn v. ReganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  4. Blodgett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API