Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dorler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1991No. 1456 and 1457 Pittsburgh 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this case media representatives appeal from an order limiting press access in a criminal trial to prevent potential jurors from exposure to potentially prejudicial pre-trial press coverage of a suppression hearing. We find the appeals moot and dismiss.

The relevant factual and procedural history may be summarized as follows. Robert Dorler, Sr. was arrested and charged with criminal homicide and conspiracy with respect to an alleged contract killing. The defendant moved to suppress certain evidence and to close the suppression hearing. The defendant’s motion for closure was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. United States v. CianfraniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosenfield v. Pennsylvania Automobile Insurance PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. WeisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. M.J. Brouillette v. T. Wolf, GovernorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Ramer v. RamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API