Legal Opinion

Rosenfield v. Pennsylvania Automobile Insurance Plan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1994No. 2225PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

Burton Rosenfíeld appeals from the June 15,1993 trial court order granting defendant-appellee Pennsylvania Automobile Insurance Plan’s (“The Plan”) motion for summary judgment, “finding that the litigation that is the subject of this action for malicious use of process did not end with a termination favorable to ... plaintiff [-appellant].” That same day, the trial court entered judgment in favor of The Plan. 1

In March, 1985 appellant was President of the Temple Insurance Agency, a Pennsylvania corporation, and Temple Premium Finance Agency, a New Jersey Corporation. Temple…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Shaffer v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Burman v. Golay and Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. DorlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. D'ERRICO v. DeFazioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Bannar v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API