Legal Opinion

Rohr v. Hoyt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendants’ motion granted. Memorandum: Defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this automobile negligence action on the ground that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury within the meaning of section 5102 of the Insurance Law. Special Term denied the motion and defendants appeal. The defendants have met their burden by submitting evidence in admissible form demonstrating that plaintiff did not as a matter of law sustain a serious injury, whereas the plaintiff has failed to meet her burden by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Mulhauser v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Cangemi v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lough v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Grasso v. AngeramiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Doyle v. Health Care Plan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Schwartz v. Aetna Life Insurance & Annuity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API