Legal Opinion

Cangemi v. Cole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendant’s motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this automobile negligence action on the ground that plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury within the meaning of section 5102 of the Insurance Law (formerly § 671). Special Term denied the motion and defendant appeals. We reverse. Neither party objected to the use on this motion of the unsworn physician’s reports. It appears from the reports that the only serious injury claimed by the plaintiff was to his shoulder. Six…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Thrall v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Thrall v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Bader v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oswin v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  2. Rohr v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API