Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schwartz v. Aetna Life Insurance & Annuity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1995Published

1Dissent

Lawton, J. (dissenting in part).

I dissent in part because Supreme Court should not have sua sponte granted plaintiff summary judgment. CPLR 3212 (b) permits a court to grant summary judgment to a non-moving party without a cross motion. That relief is warranted only if, after searching the record, a court concludes that no triable issues of fact exist *976and that the non-moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law (see generally, Grimaldi v Pagan, 135 AD2d 496; Fertico Belgium v Phosphate Chems. Export Assn., 100 AD2d 165, 171). Those conditions have not been met in this case. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grimaldi v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Belgium, S.A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Lough v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Rohr v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API