Legal Opinion

Heinz v. Consumers Light, Heat & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1909No. 16,075PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by Peter Heinz against the Consumers Light, Heat and Power Company to recover damages caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant in leaving gas j ets in one of the plaintiff’s apartments open, thus allowing gas to escape therefrom which exploded and seriously injured the plaintiff. At the conclusion of the testimony offered in behalf of the plaintiff the court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant, and of that ruling complaint-is made.

There is a motion to dismiss because the case-made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Darling v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ardmore Oil & Milling Co. v. Doggett Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Blomberg v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Hanson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API