Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Mills

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1981No. Nos. 80-5318, 80-5328PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENSLEN, District Judge.

This is an appeal of two consolidated cases challenging the District Court’s interpretation of several Kentucky election statutes. The first case originally concerned John Anderson’s attempt to have his name placed on the ballot for the presidential election in 1980 as an independent candidate. The District Court determined that a statute (KRS 118.365) required the filing of the petitions for the presidency fifty-five (55) days before the general election, and, inasmuch as Anderson’s petitions were filed before that time his name should have appeared on the presidential…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Head v. Jellico Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Campaign For Family Farms v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  3. Erard v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  4. McCavitt v. Registrars of Voters of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Socialist Workers Party v. HechlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API