Legal Opinion
Rooks v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 29, 1996No. 93-689VPublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on petitioner’s motion for review of Special Master Mill-man’s August 22, 1995 decision dismissing the petition, with prejudice, pursuant to respondent’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the court vacates the decision of the special master and remands the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTS
Randall Tyler Rooks (“Tyler”), through his mother Maria S. Rooks (“Maria”), filed a claim for compensation on November 8,1993, pursuant to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury. Act of 1986 (the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c andUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Gargoyles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Rupert v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Gardner-Cook v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Giles v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.