Legal Opinion

Mims v. Dallas County

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 29, 2005No. 3-04-CV-2754-MPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Dallas County, Texas (the “County”) has filed a motion to compel the return of a report prepared by its consulting expert that was obtained by plaintiffs after this lawsuit was filed. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is denied.

I

The facts giving rise to this discovery dispute are largely uncontested. On or about May 4, 2004, the County entered into a Professional Services Agreement for Consulting Services (the “Agreement” or “Original Agreement”) with Health Management Associates, Inc. (“HMA”), a health care…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Navigant Consulting, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
  4. McCook Metals L.L.C. v. Alcoa Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  5. Republican Party v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Microtune, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Johnson v. Air Liquide America L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
  4. League of United Latin American Citizens v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
  5. League of United Latin American Citizens v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API