Legal Opinion

Matter of Seat

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1992No. 80S00-9003-DI-182PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Respondent, Timothy M. Seat, has been charged with engaging in conduct in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, namely Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(d). A Hearing Officer appointed pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 28 has submitted his findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Respondent has petitioned for review; he does not dispute the findings but contends that they do not support the conclusion reached by the Hearing Officer.

There being no other challenge, we ac cept and adopt the Hearing Officer's findings of fact. Accordingly, we find that the Respondent is a licensed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Matter of RocheIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matter of MusserIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Matter of PetitIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bassett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re WinklerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In re DanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Matter of SimsIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API