Wegmann Realty Co. v. City of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.
Action by plaintiff, appellant here, to enjoin the city of St. Louis, the members of its Board of Public Service and the Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Company, a contractor, from proceeding further with the performance of a contract for the improvement of certain described parts of Kingshighway with an asphalt pavement, which said contract had theretofore been duly awarded to said contractor. The grounds on which plaintiff sought to enjoin the improvement are that the detailed plans and specifications for such improvement required that the asphalt to be laid on the street should be mixed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Swift v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Curtice v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Shoenberg v. FieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wallace v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Wring v. City of JeffersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Carter v. Boone County Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Cosentino v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- Hillig v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.