Curtice v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Missouri
Transferred from Kansas City Court of Appeals. (1) The court erred in refusing -to give our declarations of law which fully set forth our theory on monopoly. The facts in the record bring this case squarely within the doctrine of Shoenberg v. Field, 68 S. W. 945, and the lower court erred in refusing to follow and apply said doctrine in this case.
Read the full summary
Transferred from Kansas City Court of Appeals. (1) The court erred in refusing -to give our declarations of law which fully set forth our theory on monopoly. The facts in the record bring this case squarely within the doctrine of Shoenberg v. Field, 68 S. W. 945, and the lower court erred in refusing to follow and apply said doctrine in this case. In addition to the authorities cited in Shoenberg v. Field, we cite the following on monopoly, most of which are found in our brief in the Shoenberg case, to which we again refer: Art. 17, sec. 12, Kansas City Charter; Dillon on Municipal Corp. (4…
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Action to enforce the collection of an installment taxbill issued by Kansas City of date April 29, 1897. Judgment was for the plaintiff in the circuit court of Jackson county, where trial was had before the court without the intervention of a jury. Defendants appealed to the Kansas City Court of Appeals where the judgment was reversed. Plaintiff, who had injected a constitutional question, by way of instruction in the lower court, and had preserved it throughout in the Court of Appeals, then instituted a mandamus proceeding in this court to compel the Court of Appeals to certify the cause to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Verdin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- McQuiddy v. BrannockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Louisiana Associated Gen. Contr. v. CalcasieuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Dickey v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Gilsonite Construction Co. v. Arkansas McAlester Coal Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.