Legal Opinion

Town of Eclectic v. Mays

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1989No. 87-907, 87-947PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Mike Mays and others, representing the water customers of the town of Eclectic, filed an action seeking injunctive and declaratory relief from an Eclectic ordinance that required all water customers of the town of Eclectic to use Eclectic's garbage service. The trial court entered an order declaring that the ordinance and garbage service fee schedules adopted pursuant to the ordinance were void, because they violated the equal protection provisions of the Alabama…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Eagerton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Thorn v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. FIRST ALABAMA BANK, ETC. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Lapeyrouse Grain Corp. v. TallantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Systrends, Inc. v. GROUP 8760, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Kuhn v. State Dept. of Revenue of State of Colo.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. St. Clair County Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Pell CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. T-Mobile v. Bonet, 1100107 (Ala. 12-2-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API