Legal Opinion

Hodge v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant failed to make the annual report to the Governor required by the statute (The Code, sec. 1959) for the year ending 30 September, 1888. The relator brought this action in the name of the State to recover the penalty of $500 prescribed and allowed by the statute (The Code, sec. 1960) in case of such failure.

The defendant demurred to the complaint, and assigned as grounds of demurrer:

"1. That said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in this: That upon the facts herein stated, no cause of action hath accrued to the said W. T. Hodge under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Wilson v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Grant v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Justices of Tyrrel v. . SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1855
  5. Netherton v. . CandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Shore v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Mussallam v. MussallamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Craven County Board of Education v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. School Directors v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API