Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Siderits

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2013No. 2011AP259-DPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. In this disciplinary proceeding, the referee concluded that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) had proven violations on all five counts contained in the complaint filed by the OLR. Based on those violations, the referee recommended that Attorney Matthew C. Siderits' license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for 18 months. Attorney Siderits appeals from the referee's report and recommendation.

¶ 2. After independently reviewing the record, we determine that the facts as found by the referee demonstrate violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for all five counts alleged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against SheaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CaseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert B. MoodieWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ruppelt v. RuppeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. PetersenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ruppelt v. RuppeltWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Beth M. BantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API