Legal Opinion
Perry v. Kazolias
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of Clinton appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated May 14, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.
The defendant Matthew S. Kazolias was driving southbound at a speed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tomassi v. Town of UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Atkinson v. County of OneidaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stanford v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Gilberto v. Town of PlattekillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Parmeter v. BedardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Howard v. TylutkiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Chong Suk Rose v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Feeney v. HolemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Stach v. Town of New WindsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Turnmire v. Concrete Applied Technologies Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008