Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Holeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of Brookhaven appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), dated April 6, 2009, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant County of Suffolk separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanford v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Muhlrad v. Town of GoshenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Tishler v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Perry v. KazoliasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Martinez v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API