Legal Opinion

People v. Kaiser

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1897No. Crim. No. 305PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment'of the Superior Court of Placer County and from an order denying a new trial. J. E. Prewett, Judge. The facta are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of incest, alleged to have been committed upon his daughter, a girl under thirteen years of age. He was tried and found guilty of the offense charged, and the judgment was that he be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for the term of ten years. From that judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial he has appealed.

The indictment was returned and filed December 22, 1896, and the charging part of it is as follows: “That said defendant, Lewis Kaiser, on or about the first day of January, A. D. 1895, and before the finding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. People v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. People v. Cheong Foon ArkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. People v. KerrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. SlaughterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. McCaskill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. State v. LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API