Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 24, 1999No. 41587-5-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

— A criminal defendant was effectively forced to waive speedy trial in order to have new defense counsel appointed when he learned, just before trial, that counsel had a conflict of interest and was unprepared to go to trial. At issue is whether the charges must be dismissed under the speedy trial rule. Because the forced waiver resulted solely from the conduct of defense counsel and the waiver was otherwise effective, there was no basis for dismissal. The conviction is affirmed.

Appellant Kenneth Thomas and his girl friend, Colleen Payne, rented a room in a house in Snohomish County. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. State v. VicunaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. VicunaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API