Legal Opinion

Interphoto Corporation v. Minolta Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 16, 1969No. 33460_1PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Per curiam

This action under § 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 26 was brought, in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, against a manufacturer of imported photographic equipment by a former distributor whose agreement it had terminated. The late Judge Her-lands, in January 1969, issued a temporary injunction against the manufacturer’s refusal to deal, 295 F.Supp. 711. Not contesting at this juncture the court’s conclusion that various attempts on its part to control the prices at, the territories in, and the customers to which the distributor sold constituted per se violations of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Interphoto Corporation v. Minolta CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Tom Doherty Associates, Inc. D/B/A Tor Books v. Saban Entertainment, Inc. And Saban International N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Reuters Limited v. United Press International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Jack Kahn Music Co., Inc. v. Baldwin Piano & Organ CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  5. Argus Incorporated and Interphoto Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API