Purviance v. Shostak
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
The findings of fact made by the trial court in this action recite that in November, 1943, plaintiff and defendant entered into a joint adventure to purchase certain real property in the city of Vallejo, known as the “Thoreson Apartments,” and to share the profits and losses equally; that defendant represented to plaintiff that the prop erty could be purchased for $21,000, and that they could finance it by contributing $4,500 each and securing a bank loan for the balance of $12,000; that the representation by defendant that the property could be purchased for $21,000 was false, as it could be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Buckley v. Shell Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greenwood v. MooradianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- American Builder's Assn. v. Au-YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Wood Building Corp. v. GriffittsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Moore v. Tristar Oil and Gas Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981