Legal Opinion

Swift Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 4, 1935No. 42615PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

* Plaintiff seeks to recover an alleged overpayment of income tax for 1929 in the amount of $7,141.84 on the theory that it has proved its inventories were incorrectly stated in its return and that when correctly stated they reflect a reduction in income which will show an overpayment of the amount sought to be recovered.

The facts in this case show that plaintiff had been following a certain inventory method since about 1920, and upon examination of its return for 1930 the Commissioner prescribed a different basis and accordingly adjusted the inventories for that year by the use…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Tefft v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Kemp v. SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Finance & Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Canton Cotton Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Roybark v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  4. Brooks-Massey Dodge, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. McDuffie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API