Legal Opinion

Canton Cotton Mills v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 9, 1951No. 46847PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks a refund of income tax paid for 1936. It kept its books and prepared its tax returns by the accrual method of accounting. Plaintiff claims that certain deductions disallowed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue were ordinary and necessary business expenses deductible in 1936 under Section 23(a) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 49 Stat. 1648, 1658, 26 U.S.C.A. § 23(a). 1

Plaintiff claims that it should have been allowed to deduct $105,609.75 which it reimbursed to its customers in 1936. The reimbursements arose in the following manner. Plaintiff, which operates a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hogg v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1952
  2. Smith & Welton, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958
  3. Fred W. Amend Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  4. Breeze Corporations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Kanne v. American Factors, Limited. American Factors, Limited v. KanneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API