Legal Opinion

Gooch Milling & Elevator Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1948No. 47004PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

By order entered May 3, 1948, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was allowed and the findings of fact, conclusion of law and opinion, filed February 2, 1948, 75 F.Supp. 474 were vacated and withdrawn.

Plaintiff sues under the provisions of Section 820 of the Revenue Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 447, 581-583, § 3801, Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Code, § 3801, to recover $7,935.58, with interest, overpayment of income tax for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1935. This overpayment, which is admitted, resulted from the erroneous valuation of inventories and the resulting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Swift Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  4. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. The Crosley Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  2. Estate of Mueller v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  3. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. A. H. Karpe v. The United States. The United States (Cross-Complainant) v. Birda M. Viera (Cross-Defendant)United States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. United States v. Ed RachalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API