Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kirkman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1980No. 7914SC852Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The sole question before us is whether a proceeding to determine the right of dissent from a will by a surviving spouse is a proceeding within the meaning of G.S. 6-21(2). We hold that it is not, for the reasons stated below.

G.S. 6-21 (1979 Cum. Supp.) provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

Costs in the following matters shall be taxed against either party, or apportioned among the parties, in the discretion of the court:(2) Caveats to wills and any action or proceeding which may require the construction of any will or trust agreement, or fix the rights and duties of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Vinson v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Baxter v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. In Re the Estate of ConnorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. McWhirter v. DownsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API