Legal Opinion

Reinig v. RBS Citizens

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 2019No. 15cv1541PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In practice, determining whether plaintiffs are "similarly situated" under the FLSA involves considering all relevant factors, such as, "whether the plaintiffs are employed in the same corporate department, division, and location; whether they advance similar claims; whether they seek substantially the same form of relief; and ... [whether they have] individualized defenses." Zavala , 691 F.3d at 536-37. Although we acknowledge that some of the factors and evidence necessary to satisfy the prerequisites of Rule 23 and § 216(b) may overlap and, as a consequence, our rulings with respect to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Glendon Energy Co. v. Borough of GlendonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Max's Seafood Cafe, ex rel. Lou-Ann, Inc. v. QuinterosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank, N.A. v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. GWIAZDA v. LVNV FUNDING, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. HAYES v. TICEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. HOLTEC INTERNATIONAL v. PANDJIRIS, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API