Legal Opinion
City of Romulus v. Department of Environmental Quality
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 2004No. Docket 236673PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Zahra, P.J.,
Appellee Environmental Disposal Systems, Inc. (EDS), submitted an application to respondent, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (deq), for a permit under Part 111 of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (nrepa), MCL 324.11101 et seq., authorizing the construction of a hazardous waste underground deep injection well facility on an undeveloped site that contained wetlands located in the city of Romulus. 1999 AC, R 299.9603 (Rule 603) provides that new hazardous waste facilities shall not be located in a wetland. After becoming aware that the site…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Kenneth Henes Special Projects Procurement, Marketing & Consulting Corp. v. Continental Biomass Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- VanZandt v. State Employees' Retirement SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- English v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Mericka v. Department of Community HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Bureau of Safety & RegulationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.